Park Street University Thumbnail

Co-Packing vs. Self-Distilling | Resources

Cost Analysis: Co-Packing vs. Self-Distilling

Today, we’re sharing insights from Jason Barrett, the founder of Black Button Distilling, about the options for launching a spirit brand. This episode focuses on comparing co-packing with self-distilling, discussing costs, benefits, and considerations for brand owners.

Overview of Co-Packing

Co-packing represents a popular pathway for new spirit brands. Understanding what it involves can clarify your options.

  • Definition: A co-packer is a licensed distillery that produces beverages for other brands, saving startups significant resources.
  • Variety of Co-Packers: They range from small craft distilleries to large manufacturers, each offering different production capacities.
  • Ideal for Startups: Smaller brands can leverage co-packing to reduce initial costs without the need for building facilities or investing in equipment.
  • Cost Structure: Typically, costs include setup fees and a per-unit charge, making it easy to budget for specific production runs.
  • Quick Market Access: Brands can enter the market faster by using co-packers, as existing facilities and expertise are already in place.

Cost Comparison Between Methods

Analyzing costs is a big part of deciding between self-distilling and co-packing. Knowing the financial implications helps make informed decisions.

  • Self-Distilling Costs: Starting your own distillery requires hefty upfront investment, including equipment, leasing space, and meeting licensing regulations.
  • Example Breakdown: Investing $1 million into self-distilling may only leave around $300,000 after initial costs, significantly slowing down other essential business activities.
  • Co-Packing Affordability: With co-packing, initial production costs could be as low as $280,000, offering more budget flexibility for growth.
  • Fixed Costs vs. Variable Costs: Self-distilling means facing ongoing fixed costs despite fluctuating production needs, which can strain financial resources.
  • Long-Term Impacts: Evaluating long-term goals helps determine which path aligns better with your brand's ambitions.

Deciding Factors for Brands

Choosing between self-distilling and co-packing depends heavily on brand priorities and individual goals. Exploring what's best for you is key.

  • Brand Creation Focus: Decide if your passion lies in distilling or in branding and selling the product.
  • Growth Plans: Identify if your brand aims for rapid scaling, as co-packing offers more immediate flexibility.
  • Resource Management: Assess whether you have the resources to manage a distillery's ongoing costs and demands.
  • Production Control: Self-distilling provides hands-on control over every aspect of production, appealing to those who prioritize craftsmanship.
  • Initial Advice: Evaluate both paths carefully; this decision significantly affects your brand's future and chances for success.

Key Takeaways

  • Co-packing offers lower upfront costs and faster market entry for new brands.
  • Self-distilling involves substantial investments and resources, ideal for those deeply invested in the production process.
  • Brand priorities will heavily influence the choice between co-packing and self-distilling.
  • Both paths have their benefits; understanding your long-term vision is essential for making the right decision.
  • Contact the Strategic Sourcing Hub for further insights on co-packing and brand strategy.

Watch the Full Video

If it piques your interest, you can find the full conversation below.


Watch on Youtube