Co-Packing vs. Self-Distilling | Resources
Share
Cost Analysis: Co-Packing vs. Self-Distilling
Today, we’re sharing insights from Jason Barrett, the founder of Black Button Distilling, about the options for launching a spirit brand. This episode focuses on comparing co-packing with self-distilling, discussing costs, benefits, and considerations for brand owners.
Overview of Co-Packing
Co-packing represents a popular pathway for new spirit brands. Understanding what it involves can clarify your options.
- Definition: A co-packer is a licensed distillery that produces beverages for other brands, saving startups significant resources.
- Variety of Co-Packers: They range from small craft distilleries to large manufacturers, each offering different production capacities.
- Ideal for Startups: Smaller brands can leverage co-packing to reduce initial costs without the need for building facilities or investing in equipment.
- Cost Structure: Typically, costs include setup fees and a per-unit charge, making it easy to budget for specific production runs.
- Quick Market Access: Brands can enter the market faster by using co-packers, as existing facilities and expertise are already in place.
Cost Comparison Between Methods
Analyzing costs is a big part of deciding between self-distilling and co-packing. Knowing the financial implications helps make informed decisions.
- Self-Distilling Costs: Starting your own distillery requires hefty upfront investment, including equipment, leasing space, and meeting licensing regulations.
- Example Breakdown: Investing $1 million into self-distilling may only leave around $300,000 after initial costs, significantly slowing down other essential business activities.
- Co-Packing Affordability: With co-packing, initial production costs could be as low as $280,000, offering more budget flexibility for growth.
- Fixed Costs vs. Variable Costs: Self-distilling means facing ongoing fixed costs despite fluctuating production needs, which can strain financial resources.
- Long-Term Impacts: Evaluating long-term goals helps determine which path aligns better with your brand's ambitions.
Deciding Factors for Brands
Choosing between self-distilling and co-packing depends heavily on brand priorities and individual goals. Exploring what's best for you is key.
- Brand Creation Focus: Decide if your passion lies in distilling or in branding and selling the product.
- Growth Plans: Identify if your brand aims for rapid scaling, as co-packing offers more immediate flexibility.
- Resource Management: Assess whether you have the resources to manage a distillery's ongoing costs and demands.
- Production Control: Self-distilling provides hands-on control over every aspect of production, appealing to those who prioritize craftsmanship.
- Initial Advice: Evaluate both paths carefully; this decision significantly affects your brand's future and chances for success.
Key Takeaways
- Co-packing offers lower upfront costs and faster market entry for new brands.
- Self-distilling involves substantial investments and resources, ideal for those deeply invested in the production process.
- Brand priorities will heavily influence the choice between co-packing and self-distilling.
- Both paths have their benefits; understanding your long-term vision is essential for making the right decision.
- Contact the Strategic Sourcing Hub for further insights on co-packing and brand strategy.
Watch the Full Video
If it piques your interest, you can find the full conversation below.
Watch on Youtube

About the author
Sam Myers-Shah
Founder, comanufacturers.com
- Background Former food business operator with firsthand experience evaluating manufacturing fit, qualifying partners, and building sourcing workflows for operators.
Sam built comanufacturers.com after firsthand experience trying to find the right manufacturing partner in food. He leads the product direction around manufacturer discovery, sourcing workflow, and operator-first research.